Then again if you use linux you’d notice all the bsd stuff in there… like crazy. The bottom line is that the commoditization of software is good for businesses in general, if not specifically for the “software vendor” sub-market (i.e. Capitalism and communism are such loaded terms, that mean so many different things for so many people (and rarely are they understood correctly) that to use them in conversations about the GPL is asking for trouble. client-states who are forced into “pure” capitalism, something which hasn’t existed in the U.S. Ours are all mixed economies (well, save for some U.S. They see it as preventing other Microsofts from emerging, as if that was a bad thing.Īs far as communism and capitalism, the fact is that these are ideologies that no longer exist in the current marketplace. Most of the people who criticize the GPL fail to understand this simple fact. Selling software isn’t the be-all, end-all of computing. And, since the GPL doesn’t require any changes to be made public if the modified software isn’t redistributed, it can even give a competitive edge over others. The GPL and BSDL are equally profitable for the large majority of corporations who do not derive their income from the sale of software, but who rather use software as tools in their respective businesses. What you say is only true for corporations that sell software, which represents only a small fraction of the corporate world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |